Australian Community Participation Questionnaire

Overview

Purpose
To measure community participation
Respondent
Person with a Disability
Administration Method
Survey
Administration Mode
Mail
Item Count
63
Populations
  • Mental Health Challenges
  • Physical Disability

Instrument Citation(s)

Berry, H. & Shipley, M(2009). Longing to belong: personal soical captial and psychological distress in an Austrailian coastal region. Retrieved from https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/05_2012/sprp_39.pdf PDF Link to survey can be found on appendix E

Instrument Domains

DomainNumber of Items
Community Inclusion57
Meaningful activity41
Social connectedness and relationships19
Employment0
Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion0
Transportation0
Caregiver Support0
Access to resources0
Family caregiver/natural support involvement0
Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing0
Training and skill-building0
Choice and Control0
Choice of services and supports0
Personal choices and goals0
Personal freedoms and dignity of risk0
Self-direction0
Consumer Leadership in System Development0
Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement0
Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement0
System supports meaningful consumer involvement0
Equity0
Availability0
Equitable access and resource allocation0
Transparency and consistency0
Fluctuation of Need0
Holistic Health and Functioning0
Health promotion and prevention0
Individual health and functioning0
Human and Legal Rights0
Freedom from abuse and neglect0
Informed decision-making0
Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights0
Privacy0
Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights0
Level of Caregiver Well-Being0
Person-Centered Planning and Coordination0
Assessment0
Coordination0
Person-centered planning0
Service Delivery and Effectiveness0
Delivery0
Person's needs met and goals realized0
System Performance and Accountability0
Data management and use0
Evidence-based practice0
Financing and service delivery structures0
Workforce0
Adequately compensated with benefits0
Culturally competent0
Demonstrated competencies when appropriate0
Person-centered approach to services0
Safety of and respect for the worker0
Staff Turnover0
Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability0
Workforce engagement and participation0

Psychometric Citations

  • Berry, H. L., Rodgers, B., & Dear, K. B. (2007). Preliminary development and validation of an Australian community participation questionnaire: Types of participation and associations with distress in a coastal community. Social science & medicine, 64(8), 1719-1737.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    mean 52.76; range 19–97;

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years; 65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Australia

    Sample: Disability Type

    Not Reported

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    500 women (51.9%)

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Stratified Random Sample

    Sample: Size

    963

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach's alpha = .88

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    Active interest in current affairs (AIC: start = 619.62; end = 65.36); Voluntary sector activity (AIC: start = 179.86; end = 55.45)

    Validity: Face Validity

    Defining participation as comprising informal social connectedness, civic engagement, and political participation.

    Study design
    Cross-Sectional
  • Berry, H. L., & Shipley, M. (2009). Longing to belong: personal social capital and psychological distress in an Australian coastal region. Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.

    Type of Publication
    Technical report
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    19 to 97 years (M=52.78 years, SD=18.24, Md=52 years)

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years, 65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Australia

    Sample: Disability Type

    Not Reported

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    500 women (51.9 per cent) and 463 men (48.1 per cent)

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Stratified Random Sample

    Sample: Size

    963

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Contact with immediate household 0.96; Contact with extended family 0.86; Contact with friends 0.85; Contact with neighbours 0.92; Social contact with workmates 0.88; Adult learning .74; Religious observance .76; Organised community activities .90; Voluntary sector activity .90; Giving money to charity .64; Active interest in current affairs .85; Expressing opinions publicly .85; Community activism .88; Political protest .72

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    One‐factor congeneric modelling provided strong support for the construct validity.

    Validity: Content Validity (e.g., Expert Judgement)

    One‐factor congeneric modelling provided strong support for the content validity (representativeness of items).

    Validity: Face Validity

    One‐factor congeneric modelling provided strong support for the face validity (self‐evident validity).

    Study design
    Cross-Sectional