Community Integration Questionnaire - Revised (CIQ-R)
Overview
- Purpose
- Used to assess social role limitations and community interaction of people with acquired brain injury
- Respondents
- Proxy
- Person with a Disability
- Administration Method
- Interview
- Administration Mode
- In-person
- Developer
- NIDRR with Barry Willer & Libby Callaway
- Item Count
- 18
- Population
- Traumatic Brain Injury
Instrument Citation(s)
Callaway, L., Winkler, D., Tippett, A., Migliorini, C., Herd, N. & Willer, B. (2014). The Community
Integration Questionnaire-Revised (CIQ-R). Melbourne, Australia: Summer Foundation Ltd.
https://www.summerfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/CIQ-R-Normative-Data-Report-2014.pdf 
Instrument Domains
| Domain | Number of Items |
|---|---|
| Community Inclusion | 11 |
| Employment | 1 |
| Meaningful activity | 5 |
| Social connectedness and relationships | 6 |
| Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion | 0 |
| Transportation | 0 |
| Caregiver Support | 0 |
| Access to resources | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support involvement | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing | 0 |
| Training and skill-building | 0 |
| Choice and Control | 0 |
| Choice of services and supports | 0 |
| Personal choices and goals | 0 |
| Personal freedoms and dignity of risk | 0 |
| Self-direction | 0 |
| Consumer Leadership in System Development | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| System supports meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| Equity | 0 |
| Availability | 0 |
| Equitable access and resource allocation | 0 |
| Transparency and consistency | 0 |
| Fluctuation of Need | 0 |
| Holistic Health and Functioning | 0 |
| Health promotion and prevention | 0 |
| Individual health and functioning | 0 |
| Human and Legal Rights | 0 |
| Freedom from abuse and neglect | 0 |
| Informed decision-making | 0 |
| Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights | 0 |
| Privacy | 0 |
| Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights | 0 |
| Level of Caregiver Well-Being | 0 |
| Person-Centered Planning and Coordination | 0 |
| Assessment | 0 |
| Coordination | 0 |
| Person-centered planning | 0 |
| Service Delivery and Effectiveness | 0 |
| Delivery | 0 |
| Person's needs met and goals realized | 0 |
| System Performance and Accountability | 0 |
| Data management and use | 0 |
| Evidence-based practice | 0 |
| Financing and service delivery structures | 0 |
| Workforce | 0 |
| Adequately compensated with benefits | 0 |
| Culturally competent | 0 |
| Demonstrated competencies when appropriate | 0 |
| Person-centered approach to services | 0 |
| Safety of and respect for the worker | 0 |
| Staff Turnover | 0 |
| Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability | 0 |
| Workforce engagement and participation | 0 |
Psychometric Citation
Callaway, L., Winkler, D., Tippett, A., Herd, N., Migliorini, C., & Willer, B. (2016). The Community Integration Questionnaire – Revised: Australian normative data and measurement of electronic social networking. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 63(3), 143-153.
- Type of Publication
- Peer review
- Instrument Language
- English
- Sample: Age (Mean and Range)
18-29 (29%);
30-39 (22%);
40-49 (20%);
50-59 (21%);
60-64 (9%)- Sample: Age Group
18-64 Years
- Sample: Countries/State
Australia
- Sample: Disability Type
Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Traumatic Brain Injury
- Sample: Gender (%male)
50%
- Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)
Not Reported
- Sample: Sampling Strategy
matched to the demographics of the broader Australian population
- Sample: Size
1973
- Reliability: Test-retest
test-retest correlation for the overall survey (r=0.84)
- Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)
Confirmatory factor analysis showed an adequate model fit: CFI=.921; TLI=.901; RMSEA=.056; SRMR =.051
- Study design
- Cross-sectional