Evaluating Social Inclusion Questionnaire
Overview
- Purpose
- To measure the level of social inclusion
- Respondent
- Person with a Disability
- Administration Method
- Interview
- Administration Mode
- In-person 0
- Population
- Mental Health Challenges
Instrument Citation(s)
Stickley, T., & Shaw, R. (2006). Evaluating social inclusion: Theodore Stickley and Rebecca Shaw describe a collaborative project in which a group of mental health service users and a mental health nurse lecturer developed a questionnaire to gauge the degree to which participants feel they are included in society. Mental Health Practice, 9(10), 14-21.
Psychometric Citation
Federica Marino‐Francis, Anne Worrall‐Davies, (2010) "Development and validation of a social inclusion questionnaire to evaluate the impact of attending a modernised mental health day service", Mental Health Review Journal, Vol. 15 Issue: 1, pp.37-48, https://doi.org/10.5042/mhrj.2010.0201
- Type of Publication
- Peer review
- Instrument Language
- English
- Sample: Age (Mean and Range)
36-50
- Sample: Age Group
18-64 Years
- Sample: Countries/State
United Kingdom
- Sample: Disability Type
Mental Health Challenges
- Sample: Gender (%male)
36
- Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)
White 72%; Other 19%
- Sample: Sampling Strategy
Convenience Sample
- Sample: Size
69
- Reliability: Internal Consistency
Cronbach’s alpha = 0.80
- Reliability: Split-half
Spearman’s ⍴ between .312 and .820.
- Reliability: Test-retest
κ ranged between .121 and .824.
- Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)
EFA yielded the first seven factors (Eigenvalues >1.0) accounted for a total variance of 83.5% with the first factor accounting for nearly a third (29.8%) of the total variance.
- Study design
- Cross-Sectional