Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4)

Share this page

Overview

Purpose
(1) To assist in the clinical evaluation of people during the postacute (posthospital) period following acquired brain injury (ABI), and (2) to assist in the evaluation of rehabilitation programs designed to serve these people.
Respondents
  • Family Member
  • Provider
  • Proxy
  • Person with a Disability
Administration Method
Interview
Administration Mode
In-person
0
Population
Traumatic Brain Injury

Instrument Citation(s)

Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury (COMBI):
http://www.tbims.org/mpai/mpai4.pdf PDF

Psychometric Citations

  • Bohac, D. L., Malec, J. F., et al. (1997). Factor analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory: structure and validity.
    Brain Injury 11(7): 469-482

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=36.2 years; Range=17-72 years

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years, 65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Minnesota

    Sample: Disability Type

    Traumatic Brain Injury

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    66%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Convenience Sample

    Sample: Size

    201

    Validity: Other Evidence

    EFA found eight factor model explaining 64.4% of variance

    Study design
    Cross-Sectional

  • Kean, J., Malec, J.F., Cooper, D.B., & Bowles, A.O. (2013). Utility of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 for
    Self-Reported Outcomes in a Military Sample With Traumatic Brain Injury
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 94(12), 2417 - 2424; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.006

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Median-29 years

    Sample: Age Group

    Not Reported

    Sample: Countries/State

    Texas

    Sample: Disability Type

    Traumatic Brain Injury

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    93%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Convenience Sample

    Sample: Size

    404

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach's Alphas for overall (α=0.94)

    Validity: Other Evidence

    Initial MRFA found 2-factor model explaining 50.8% of variance.

    Study design
    Cross-Sectional