PART-O - Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective
Overview
- Purpose
- Measure community and society participation following traumatic brain injury
- Respondents
- Proxy
- Person with a Disability
- Administration Method
- Interview
- Administration Mode
- Phone
- Developer
- National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research’s Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems. The original PART-O included 24 items derived or modified from three measures commonly found in the TBI literature: Community Integration Questionnaire (Willer, Ottenbacher and Coad, 1994); Participation Objective, Participation Subjective (Brown, Dijkers, Gordon et al., 2004); and the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (Whiteneck, Charlifue, Gerhart et al., 1992).
- Item Count
- 24
- Population
- Traumatic Brain Injury
Instrument Citation(s)
Bogner, J. (2013). The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective. The
Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury. http://www.tbims.org/combi/parto
Bogner, J.A., Whiteneck, G.G., Corrigan, J.D., Lai, J., Dijkers, M.P., & Heinemann, A.W. (2011).
Comparison of scoring methods for the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools –
Objective. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 552-563.
Whiteneck, G.G., Dijkers, M.P., Heinemann, A.W., Bogner, J.A., Bushnik, T., Cicerone, K.D., Corrigan, J.D.,
Hart, T., Malec, J.F., & Millis, S.R. (2011). Development of the Participation Assessment with
Recombined Tools – Objective for use after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 542-551.
Instrument Domains
| Domain | Number of Items |
|---|---|
| Community Inclusion | 23 |
| Employment | 1 |
| Meaningful activity | 16 |
| Social connectedness and relationships | 7 |
| Transportation | 2 |
| Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion | 0 |
| Holistic Health and Functioning | 1 |
| Individual health and functioning | 1 |
| Health promotion and prevention | 0 |
| Caregiver Support | 0 |
| Access to resources | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support involvement | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing | 0 |
| Training and skill-building | 0 |
| Choice and Control | 0 |
| Choice of services and supports | 0 |
| Personal choices and goals | 0 |
| Personal freedoms and dignity of risk | 0 |
| Self-direction | 0 |
| Consumer Leadership in System Development | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| System supports meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| Equity | 0 |
| Availability | 0 |
| Equitable access and resource allocation | 0 |
| Transparency and consistency | 0 |
| Fluctuation of Need | 0 |
| Human and Legal Rights | 0 |
| Freedom from abuse and neglect | 0 |
| Informed decision-making | 0 |
| Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights | 0 |
| Privacy | 0 |
| Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights | 0 |
| Level of Caregiver Well-Being | 0 |
| Person-Centered Planning and Coordination | 0 |
| Assessment | 0 |
| Coordination | 0 |
| Person-centered planning | 0 |
| Service Delivery and Effectiveness | 0 |
| Delivery | 0 |
| Person's needs met and goals realized | 0 |
| System Performance and Accountability | 0 |
| Data management and use | 0 |
| Evidence-based practice | 0 |
| Financing and service delivery structures | 0 |
| Workforce | 0 |
| Adequately compensated with benefits | 0 |
| Culturally competent | 0 |
| Demonstrated competencies when appropriate | 0 |
| Person-centered approach to services | 0 |
| Safety of and respect for the worker | 0 |
| Staff Turnover | 0 |
| Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability | 0 |
| Workforce engagement and participation | 0 |
Psychometric Citation
Whiteneck, G.G., Dijkers, M.P., Heinemann, A.W., Bogner, J.A., Bushnik, T., Cicerone, K.D., Corrigan, J.D.,
Hart, T., Malec, J.F., & Millis, S.R. (2011). Development of the Participation Assessment with
Recombined Tools – Objective for use after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 542-551.- Type of Publication
- Peer review
- Instrument Language
- English
- Sample: Age (Mean and Range)
Mean=36.6 years
- Sample: Age Group
18-64 Years
- Sample: Countries/State
The U.S.: AL, CA, CO, MN, NJ, NY, OH, and PA
- Sample: Disability Type
Traumatic Brain Injury
- Sample: Gender (%male)
71%
- Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)
74% white;
12% black;
11% Hispanic;
3% other races- Sample: Sampling Strategy
Not Reported
- Sample: Size
400
- Reliability: Internal Consistency
IRT: person reliability = .86.
- Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)
Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a single factor;
Correlations with legacy measures ranged from .36 to .83;
- Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)
Correlations with other participation and functional measures ranged from .32 to .66 (in absolute value)
- Study design
- Cross-sectional