Perceived Competence for Recovery Scale (PCRS)
Overview
- Purpose
- To assess perceived ability to recover from mental illness.
- Developer
- Cook, Grey, Burke-Miller, & Jonikas [can't find anything by this group]
- Item Count
- 4
- Population
- General Population
Instrument Citation(s)
Original Perceived Competence for Recovery Scale. http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/perceived-competence-scales/
Williams, G.C., Freedman, Z.R., & Deci, E.L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate glucose control in
patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 21, 1644-1651.
Williams, G.C., & Deci, E.L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test
of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779.
Adapted by Cook, J.A., Grey, D.D., Burke-Miller, J.K., & Jonikas, J.A. (2011). Self-directed financing of
services for people with serious mental illness: Purchases made by participants in a self-directed
care program. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 14, S5.
Instrument Domains
| Domain | Number of Items |
|---|---|
| Holistic Health and Functioning | 4 |
| Individual health and functioning | 4 |
| Health promotion and prevention | 0 |
| Caregiver Support | 0 |
| Access to resources | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support involvement | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing | 0 |
| Training and skill-building | 0 |
| Choice and Control | 0 |
| Choice of services and supports | 0 |
| Personal choices and goals | 0 |
| Personal freedoms and dignity of risk | 0 |
| Self-direction | 0 |
| Community Inclusion | 0 |
| Employment | 0 |
| Meaningful activity | 0 |
| Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion | 0 |
| Social connectedness and relationships | 0 |
| Transportation | 0 |
| Consumer Leadership in System Development | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| System supports meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| Equity | 0 |
| Availability | 0 |
| Equitable access and resource allocation | 0 |
| Transparency and consistency | 0 |
| Fluctuation of Need | 0 |
| Human and Legal Rights | 0 |
| Freedom from abuse and neglect | 0 |
| Informed decision-making | 0 |
| Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights | 0 |
| Privacy | 0 |
| Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights | 0 |
| Level of Caregiver Well-Being | 0 |
| Person-Centered Planning and Coordination | 0 |
| Assessment | 0 |
| Coordination | 0 |
| Person-centered planning | 0 |
| Service Delivery and Effectiveness | 0 |
| Delivery | 0 |
| Person's needs met and goals realized | 0 |
| System Performance and Accountability | 0 |
| Data management and use | 0 |
| Evidence-based practice | 0 |
| Financing and service delivery structures | 0 |
| Workforce | 0 |
| Adequately compensated with benefits | 0 |
| Culturally competent | 0 |
| Demonstrated competencies when appropriate | 0 |
| Person-centered approach to services | 0 |
| Safety of and respect for the worker | 0 |
| Staff Turnover | 0 |
| Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability | 0 |
| Workforce engagement and participation | 0 |