Peer Outcomes Protocol - Program satisfaction module and well-being module
Overview
- Purpose
- Assess participant reported well-being and satisfaction with peer support group services
- Respondent
- Person with a Disability
- Administration Method
- Interview
- Administration Mode
- In-person
- Item Count
- 86
- Population
- Mental Health Challenges
Instrument Citation(s)
Campbell, J., Cook., J.A., Jonikas, J.A., & Einspahr, K. (2004). The Peer Outcomes Protocol (POP).
Campbell-Orde, T., Chamberlin, J., & Carpenter, J., & Leff, H.S. (2005). Measuring the promise: A
compendium of recovery measures, volume II. Cambridge, MA: The Evaluation Center @ Human
Services Research Institute.
Campbell, J., Cook., J.A., Jonikas, J.A., & Einspahr, K. (2004). Peer Outcomes Protocol (POP): Question-by-
question guide. http://www.cmhsrp.uic.edu/download/pop.QbyQ.pdf 
Instrument Domains
| Domain | Number of Items |
|---|---|
| Choice and Control | 11 |
| Choice of services and supports | 2 |
| Personal choices and goals | 2 |
| Personal freedoms and dignity of risk | 6 |
| Self-direction | 1 |
| Community Inclusion | 7 |
| Employment | 1 |
| Meaningful activity | 3 |
| Social connectedness and relationships | 2 |
| Transportation | 2 |
| Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion | 0 |
| Consumer Leadership in System Development | 1 |
| System supports meaningful consumer involvement | 1 |
| Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| Holistic Health and Functioning | 5 |
| Individual health and functioning | 5 |
| Health promotion and prevention | 0 |
| Human and Legal Rights | 9 |
| Freedom from abuse and neglect | 7 |
| Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights | 1 |
| Privacy | 1 |
| Informed decision-making | 0 |
| Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights | 0 |
| Service Delivery and Effectiveness | 21 |
| Person's needs met and goals realized | 21 |
| Delivery | 0 |
| Workforce | 10 |
| Culturally competent | 1 |
| Demonstrated competencies when appropriate | 1 |
| Person-centered approach to services | 8 |
| Adequately compensated with benefits | 0 |
| Safety of and respect for the worker | 0 |
| Staff Turnover | 0 |
| Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability | 0 |
| Workforce engagement and participation | 0 |
| Caregiver Support | 0 |
| Access to resources | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support involvement | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing | 0 |
| Training and skill-building | 0 |
| Equity | 0 |
| Availability | 0 |
| Equitable access and resource allocation | 0 |
| Transparency and consistency | 0 |
| Fluctuation of Need | 0 |
| Level of Caregiver Well-Being | 0 |
| Person-Centered Planning and Coordination | 0 |
| Assessment | 0 |
| Coordination | 0 |
| Person-centered planning | 0 |
| System Performance and Accountability | 0 |
| Data management and use | 0 |
| Evidence-based practice | 0 |
| Financing and service delivery structures | 0 |
Psychometric Citation
Campbell-Orde, T., Chamberlin, J., & Carpenter, J., & Leff, H.S. (2005). Measuring the promise: A
compendium of recovery measures, volume II. Cambridge, MA: The Evaluation Center @ Human
Services Research Institute.- Type of Publication
- Technical report
- Instrument Language
- English
- Sample: Age (Mean and Range)
Not provided
- Sample: Age Group
Not provided
- Sample: Countries/State
Missouri
- Sample: Disability Type
Mental Health Challenges
- Sample: Gender (%male)
Not provided
- Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)
Not provided
- Sample: Sampling Strategy
Not Reported
- Sample: Size
100
- Reliability: Inter-rater
Inter-rater reliability for the subscales ranged from .47 to .65.
- Reliability: Internal Consistency
Cronbach's alpha for employment satisfaction (Cronbach’s α =.71)
Cronbach's alpha for community satisfaction (Cronbach’s α =.72)
Cronbach's alpha for social satisfaction (Cronbach’s α =.76)
Cronbach's alpha for social acceptance (Cronbach’s α =.93)
Cronbach's alpha for heath (Cronbach’s α =.85)
Cronbach's alpha for quality of life (Cronbach’s α =.74)
Cronbach's alpha for personhood (Cronbach’s α =.83)
Cronbach's alpha for empowerment (Cronbach’s α =.89)
Cronbach's alpha for recovery (Cronbach’s α =.86)
Cronbach's alpha for program quality of life (Cronbach’s α =.88)
Cronbach's alpha for program satisfaction (Cronbach’s α =.95)
Cronbach's alpha for felt coercion (Cronbach’s α =.83)- Reliability: Test-retest
Employment satisfaction (r =.47)
Community satisfaction (r =.73)
Social satisfaction (r =.54)
Social acceptance (r =.66)
Heath (r =.88)
Quality of life (r =.63)
Personhood (r =.73)
Empowerment (r =.63)
Recovery (r =.61)
Program quality of life (r =.72)
Program satisfaction (r =.78)
Felt coercion (r =.85)- Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)
The correlation between this measure and other similar measures ranged from .46 (with Recovery Assessment Scale) to .76 ( with Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale).
- Study design
- Cross-Sectional