Peer Outcomes Protocol - Program satisfaction module and well-being module

Share this page

Overview

Purpose
Assess participant reported well-being and satisfaction with peer support group services
Respondent
Person with a Disability
Administration Method
Interview
Administration Mode
In-person
0
Population
Mental Health Challenges

Instrument Citation(s)

Campbell, J., Cook., J.A., Jonikas, J.A., & Einspahr, K. (2004). The Peer Outcomes Protocol (POP).

Campbell-Orde, T., Chamberlin, J., & Carpenter, J., & Leff, H.S. (2005). Measuring the promise: A
compendium of recovery measures, volume II. Cambridge, MA: The Evaluation Center @ Human
Services Research Institute.

Campbell, J., Cook., J.A., Jonikas, J.A., & Einspahr, K. (2004). Peer Outcomes Protocol (POP): Question-by-
question guide. http://www.cmhsrp.uic.edu/download/pop.QbyQ.pdf PDF

Psychometric Citation

  • Campbell-Orde, T., Chamberlin, J., & Carpenter, J., & Leff, H.S. (2005). Measuring the promise: A
    compendium of recovery measures, volume II. Cambridge, MA: The Evaluation Center @ Human
    Services Research Institute.

    Type of Publication
    Technical report
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Not provided

    Sample: Age Group

    Not provided

    Sample: Countries/State

    Missouri

    Sample: Disability Type

    Mental Health Challenges

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    Not provided

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not provided

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Not Reported

    Sample: Size

    100

    Reliability: Inter-rater

    Inter-rater reliability for the subscales ranged from .47 to .65.

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach's alpha for employment satisfaction (Cronbach’s α =.71)
    Cronbach's alpha for community satisfaction (Cronbach’s α =.72)
    Cronbach's alpha for social satisfaction (Cronbach’s α =.76)
    Cronbach's alpha for social acceptance (Cronbach’s α =.93)
    Cronbach's alpha for heath (Cronbach’s α =.85)
    Cronbach's alpha for quality of life (Cronbach’s α =.74)
    Cronbach's alpha for personhood (Cronbach’s α =.83)
    Cronbach's alpha for empowerment (Cronbach’s α =.89)
    Cronbach's alpha for recovery (Cronbach’s α =.86)
    Cronbach's alpha for program quality of life (Cronbach’s α =.88)
    Cronbach's alpha for program satisfaction (Cronbach’s α =.95)
    Cronbach's alpha for felt coercion (Cronbach’s α =.83)

    Reliability: Test-retest

    Employment satisfaction (r =.47)
    Community satisfaction (r =.73)
    Social satisfaction (r =.54)
    Social acceptance (r =.66)
    Heath (r =.88)
    Quality of life (r =.63)
    Personhood (r =.73)
    Empowerment (r =.63)
    Recovery (r =.61)
    Program quality of life (r =.72)
    Program satisfaction (r =.78)
    Felt coercion (r =.85)

    Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)

    The correlation between this measure and other similar measures ranged from .46 (with Recovery Assessment Scale) to .76 ( with Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale).

    Study design
    Cross-Sectional