Perceived Quality of Life Scale (PQoL)
Overview
- Purpose
- Evaluate quality of life and functional status for people with a wide range of wellness or disability levels
- Respondent
- Person with a Disability
- Administration Method
- Interview
- Administration Mode
- In-person
- Item Count
- 20
- Population
- General Population
Instrument Citation(s)
Survey available at: http://depts.washington.edu/seaqol/PQOL
Patrick DL, Kinne S, Engelberg RA, Pearlman RA. (2000). Functional status and perceived quality of life in adults with and without chronic conditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(8), 779-785.
Instrument Domains
Domain | Number of Items |
---|---|
Community Inclusion | 8 |
Employment | 1 |
Meaningful activity | 2 |
Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion | 1 |
Social connectedness and relationships | 5 |
Transportation | 1 |
Holistic Health and Functioning | 8 |
Individual health and functioning | 8 |
Health promotion and prevention | 0 |
Person-Centered Planning and Coordination | 3 |
Assessment | 3 |
Coordination | 0 |
Person-centered planning | 0 |
Caregiver Support | 0 |
Access to resources | 0 |
Family caregiver/natural support involvement | 0 |
Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing | 0 |
Training and skill-building | 0 |
Choice and Control | 0 |
Choice of services and supports | 0 |
Personal choices and goals | 0 |
Personal freedoms and dignity of risk | 0 |
Self-direction | 0 |
Consumer Leadership in System Development | 0 |
Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement | 0 |
Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
System supports meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
Equity | 0 |
Availability | 0 |
Equitable access and resource allocation | 0 |
Transparency and consistency | 0 |
Fluctuation of Need | 0 |
Human and Legal Rights | 0 |
Freedom from abuse and neglect | 0 |
Informed decision-making | 0 |
Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights | 0 |
Privacy | 0 |
Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights | 0 |
Level of Caregiver Well-Being | 0 |
Service Delivery and Effectiveness | 0 |
Delivery | 0 |
Person's needs met and goals realized | 0 |
System Performance and Accountability | 0 |
Data management and use | 0 |
Evidence-based practice | 0 |
Financing and service delivery structures | 0 |
Workforce | 0 |
Adequately compensated with benefits | 0 |
Culturally competent | 0 |
Demonstrated competencies when appropriate | 0 |
Person-centered approach to services | 0 |
Safety of and respect for the worker | 0 |
Staff Turnover | 0 |
Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability | 0 |
Workforce engagement and participation | 0 |
Psychometric Citations
Patrick DL, Danis M, Southerland LI, Hong G. (1988). Quality of life following intensive care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 3(3), 218-223.
- Type of Publication
- Peer review
- Instrument Language
- English
- Sample: Age (Mean and Range)
Mean=69 years; Range=61 to 77 years
- Sample: Age Group
18-64 Years, 65+ Years
- Sample: Countries/State
North Carolina
- Sample: Disability Type
Not Reported
- Sample: Gender (%male)
52%
- Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)
64% White
- Sample: Sampling Strategy
Convenience Sample
- Sample: Size
69
- Reliability: Internal Consistency
Cronbach's Alpha for the overall survey (α=0.88)
- Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)
correlation with Sickness Impact Profile (r=-.49); correlation with Sickness Impact Profile subscales (r= -.33 to -.48); correlation with social contact (r=.36); correlation with affective status (r=.54)
- Study design
- Cross-Sectional
Patrick DL, Kinne S, Engelberg RA, Pearlman RA. (2000). Functional status and perceived quality of life in adults with and without chronic conditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(8), 779-785.
- Type of Publication
- Peer review
- Instrument Language
- English
- Sample: Age (Mean and Range)
Mean=58 years
- Sample: Age Group
Under 18 Years, 18-64 Years, 65+ Years
- Sample: Countries/State
Washington
- Sample: Disability Type
Physical Disability, Mental Health Challenges, Age Related Disability
- Sample: Gender (%male)
47%
- Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)
Not reported
- Sample: Sampling Strategy
Convenience Sample, Not Reported
- Sample: Size
454
- Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)
correlation with Sickness Impact Profile overall (r=.69); correlation with Sickness Impact Profile by sample groups (r=.09 to -.73)
- Study design
- Cross-Sectional