Overview

Purpose
Evaluate quality of life and functional status for people with a wide range of wellness or disability levels
Respondent
Person with a Disability
Administration Method
Interview
Administration Mode
In-person
Item Count
20
Population
General Population

Instrument Citation(s)

Survey available at: http://depts.washington.edu/seaqol/PQOL

Patrick DL, Kinne S, Engelberg RA, Pearlman RA. (2000). Functional status and perceived quality of life in adults with and without chronic conditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(8), 779-785.

Instrument Domains

DomainNumber of Items
Community Inclusion8
Employment1
Meaningful activity2
Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion1
Social connectedness and relationships5
Transportation1
Holistic Health and Functioning8
Individual health and functioning8
Health promotion and prevention0
Person-Centered Planning and Coordination3
Assessment3
Coordination0
Person-centered planning0
Caregiver Support0
Access to resources0
Family caregiver/natural support involvement0
Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing0
Training and skill-building0
Choice and Control0
Choice of services and supports0
Personal choices and goals0
Personal freedoms and dignity of risk0
Self-direction0
Consumer Leadership in System Development0
Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement0
Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement0
System supports meaningful consumer involvement0
Equity0
Availability0
Equitable access and resource allocation0
Transparency and consistency0
Fluctuation of Need0
Human and Legal Rights0
Freedom from abuse and neglect0
Informed decision-making0
Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights0
Privacy0
Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights0
Level of Caregiver Well-Being0
Service Delivery and Effectiveness0
Delivery0
Person's needs met and goals realized0
System Performance and Accountability0
Data management and use0
Evidence-based practice0
Financing and service delivery structures0
Workforce0
Adequately compensated with benefits0
Culturally competent0
Demonstrated competencies when appropriate0
Person-centered approach to services0
Safety of and respect for the worker0
Staff Turnover0
Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability0
Workforce engagement and participation0

Psychometric Citations

  • Patrick DL, Danis M, Southerland LI, Hong G. (1988). Quality of life following intensive care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 3(3), 218-223.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=69 years; Range=61 to 77 years

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years, 65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    North Carolina

    Sample: Disability Type

    Not Reported

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    52%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    64% White

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Convenience Sample

    Sample: Size

    69

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach's Alpha for the overall survey (α=0.88)

    Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)

    correlation with Sickness Impact Profile (r=-.49); correlation with Sickness Impact Profile subscales (r= -.33 to -.48); correlation with social contact (r=.36); correlation with affective status (r=.54)

    Study design
    Cross-Sectional
  • Patrick DL, Kinne S, Engelberg RA, Pearlman RA. (2000). Functional status and perceived quality of life in adults with and without chronic conditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(8), 779-785.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=58 years

    Sample: Age Group

    Under 18 Years, 18-64 Years, 65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Washington

    Sample: Disability Type

    Physical Disability, Mental Health Challenges, Age Related Disability

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    47%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Convenience Sample, Not Reported

    Sample: Size

    454

    Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)

    correlation with Sickness Impact Profile overall (r=.69); correlation with Sickness Impact Profile by sample groups (r=.09 to -.73)

    Study design
    Cross-Sectional