Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease Scale

Overview

Purpose
Assessing quality of life
Respondent
Person with a Disability
Administration Method
Interview
Administration Mode
In-person
0
Population
Age Related Disability

Instrument Citation(s)

Logsdon, R.G. (1996). Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD). Department of Psychosocial and
Community Health: University of Washington.
http://www.cogsclub.org.uk/professionals/files/QOL-AD.pdf PDF

Logsdon, R., Gibbons, L.E., McCurry, S.M., Terri, L. (1999). Quality of life in Alzheimer’s disease: patient
and caregiver reports. J Mental Health Aging, 5, 21–32.

Psychometric Citations

  • Thorgrimsen, L., Selwood, A., Spector, A., Royan, L., de Madariaga Lopez, M., Woods, R. T., & Orrell, M.
    (2003). Whose quality of life is it anyway? The validity and reliability of the Quality of Life-
    Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) scale. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 17(4), 201-208.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    sample 1: 81.3 (6.0) [69–92]; sample 2: 85.3 (7.0) [66–101]

    Sample: Age Group

    65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    United Kingdom

    Sample: Disability Type

    Age Related Disability

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    sample 1: 44 (73.3%); sample 2: 158 (78.6%)

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Convenience Sample

    Sample: Size

    Sample 1 (n = 60); Sample 2
    (n = 201)

    Reliability: Inter-rater

    κ >0.70.

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.82

    Reliability: Test-retest

    Overall ICC = 0.6 or above; κ = 0.37 for one item “family”; κ ranged from 0.40 to 0.74 for all other items.

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    The Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity reached statistical significance (p < 0.001), and the Kaiser- Meyer-Oklin value was 0.74, thus supporting the factorability of the correlation matrix.

    Validity: Content Validity (e.g., Expert Judgement)

    The scale was found to have good content validity with no additional items required and all items necessary.

    Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)

    It correlated well with the Dementia Quality of Life scale (0.69) and with the Euroqol-5D scale (0.54), indicating good criterion concurrent validity.

    Study design
    Cross-Sectional
  • Logsdon, R., Gibbons, L.E., McCurry, S.M., Terri, L. (1999). Quality of life in Alzheimer’s disease: patient
    and caregiver reports. J Mental Health Aging, 5, 21–32.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    average 78.3 years (sd = 6.1)

    Sample: Age Group

    65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Unknown

    Sample: Disability Type

    Age Related Disability

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    53

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    86% Caucasian, 14% African American

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Convenience Sample

    Sample: Size

    77

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Coefficient Alpha = 0.88

    Reliability: Test-retest

    ICC = 0.76

    Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)

    Patient QoL-AD scores were modestly correlated with MMSE scores: r = 0.24, p<0.05

    Study design
    Cross-Sectional