To measure perceived level of social acceptance.
Person with a Disability
Administration Method
Administration Mode
Well-Being Project
Item Count
Mental Health Challenges

Instrument Citation(s)

Ralph, R.O., Kidder, K., & Phillips, D. (2000). Can we measure recovery? A compendium of recovery and
recovery-related instruments, Volume II. Cambridge, MA: The Evaluation Center @ Human
Services Research Institute.

Missouri Institute of Mental Health. Program in Consumer Studies and Training Multi-site Protocol 1.2. https://pocc.org/assets/Uploads/COSP-FUPQ-by-Q-1.2-May-23-2001.pdf PDF

Campbell, J., & Schraiber, R. (1989) The well-being project: Mental health clients speak for themselves.
Sacramento, California: Department of Health.

Instrument Domains

DomainNumber of Items
Community Inclusion1
Social connectedness and relationships1
Meaningful activity0
Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion0
Holistic Health and Functioning7
Individual health and functioning7
Health promotion and prevention0
Caregiver Support0
Access to resources0
Family caregiver/natural support involvement0
Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing0
Training and skill-building0
Choice and Control0
Choice of services and supports0
Personal choices and goals0
Personal freedoms and dignity of risk0
Consumer Leadership in System Development0
Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement0
Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement0
System supports meaningful consumer involvement0
Equitable access and resource allocation0
Transparency and consistency0
Fluctuation of Need0
Human and Legal Rights0
Freedom from abuse and neglect0
Informed decision-making0
Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights0
Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights0
Level of Caregiver Well-Being0
Person-Centered Planning and Coordination0
Person-centered planning0
Service Delivery and Effectiveness0
Person's needs met and goals realized0
System Performance and Accountability0
Data management and use0
Evidence-based practice0
Financing and service delivery structures0
Adequately compensated with benefits0
Culturally competent0
Demonstrated competencies when appropriate0
Person-centered approach to services0
Safety of and respect for the worker0
Staff Turnover0
Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability0
Workforce engagement and participation0

Psychometric Citation

  • Kressel, D., De Leon, G., Palij, M., & Rubin, G. (2000). Measuring client clinical progress in therapeutic
    community treatment: The therapeutic community Client Assessment Inventory, Client
    Assessment Summary, and Staff Assessment summary. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,
    19, 267-272.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean age = 34 years; ranges not reported

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    New York

    Sample: Disability Type

    Mental Health Challenges

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    Nearly three quarters are male

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Slightly more than half the total sample were black, a little more than a quarter were Latino and the rest were White or Other

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Convenience Sample

    Sample: Size


    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach’s for the scale (α = .95)

    Study design