Burden Scale for Family Caregivers, Long Form (BSFC)

Overview

Purpose
Measure of overall perceived burden resulting from home care
Respondent
Caregiver
Administration Method
Survey
Administration Mode
In-person
Developer
*Gräsel, Chiu, & Oliver, 2003 with Comprehensive Rehabilitation and Mental Health Services (Canada) (manual: ) *Graessel, et al. 2014:
Item Count
28
Population
Caregiver

Instrument Citation(s)

Instrument Domains

DomainNumber of Items
Level of Caregiver Well-Being28
Caregiver Support0
Access to resources0
Family caregiver/natural support involvement0
Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing0
Training and skill-building0
Choice and Control0
Choice of services and supports0
Personal choices and goals0
Personal freedoms and dignity of risk0
Self-direction0
Community Inclusion0
Employment0
Meaningful activity0
Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion0
Social connectedness and relationships0
Transportation0
Consumer Leadership in System Development0
Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement0
Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement0
System supports meaningful consumer involvement0
Equity0
Availability0
Equitable access and resource allocation0
Transparency and consistency0
Fluctuation of Need0
Holistic Health and Functioning0
Health promotion and prevention0
Individual health and functioning0
Human and Legal Rights0
Freedom from abuse and neglect0
Informed decision-making0
Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights0
Privacy0
Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights0
Person-Centered Planning and Coordination0
Assessment0
Coordination0
Person-centered planning0
Service Delivery and Effectiveness0
Delivery0
Person's needs met and goals realized0
System Performance and Accountability0
Data management and use0
Evidence-based practice0
Financing and service delivery structures0
Workforce0
Adequately compensated with benefits0
Culturally competent0
Demonstrated competencies when appropriate0
Person-centered approach to services0
Safety of and respect for the worker0
Staff Turnover0
Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability0
Workforce engagement and participation0

Psychometric Citations

  • Elmar, G., Chiu, T., & Oliver, R. (2003). Development and Validation of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC). Comprehensive Rehabilitation and Mental Health Services, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Type of Publication
    Technical report
    Instrument Language
    German, English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Age Group

    Not Reported

    Sample: Countries/State

    Canada

    Sample: Disability Type

    N/A

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Convenience Sample

    Sample: Size

    Not Reported

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach’s Alpha for the overall survey (ɑ= from .90 to .91)

    Reliability: Split-half

    Pearson's correlation r>.80 between halves for the overall survey

    Reliability: Test-retest

    test-retest correlation t for the overalll survey (r = 0.94)

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    exploratory factor analysis of the items produced 1 factors with factor loadings >. 45

    Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)

    correlated with other measures

    Study design
    Cross-sectional
  • Grasessel, E., & Berth, H. Lichet, T., & Grau, H. (2014). Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s. BMC Geriatrics, 14(23), 1-9.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    German
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=59.2 Years

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years; 65 + Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Germany

    Sample: Disability Type

    N/A

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    27%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Not Reported

    Sample: Size

    351

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach’s Alpha for the overalll survey (ɑ= 0.92)

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    Correlation with the severity of the dementia syndrome = -.21; with disturbing behavior = .53;

    Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)

    predicted the institutionalization of people with dementia

    Study design
    Cross-sectional