Burden Scale for Family Caregivers, Long Form (BSFC)

Overview

Purpose
Measure of overall perceived burden resulting from home care
Respondent
Caregiver
Administration Method
Survey
Administration Mode
In-person
Developer
*Gräsel, Chiu, & Oliver, 2003 with Comprehensive Rehabilitation and Mental Health Services (Canada) (manual: ) *Graessel, et al. 2014:
0
Population
Caregiver

Instrument Citation(s)

Psychometric Citations

  • Elmar, G., Chiu, T., & Oliver, R. (2003). Development and Validation of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC). Comprehensive Rehabilitation and Mental Health Services, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Type of Publication
    Technical report
    Instrument Language
    German, English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Age Group

    Not Reported

    Sample: Countries/State

    Canada

    Sample: Disability Type

    N/A

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Convenience Sample

    Sample: Size

    Not Reported

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach’s Alpha for the overall survey (ɑ= from .90 to .91)

    Reliability: Split-half

    Pearson's correlation r>.80 between halves for the overall survey

    Reliability: Test-retest

    test-retest correlation t for the overalll survey (r = 0.94)

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    exploratory factor analysis of the items produced 1 factors with factor loadings >. 45

    Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)

    correlated with other measures

    Study design
    Cross-sectional
  • Grasessel, E., & Berth, H. Lichet, T., & Grau, H. (2014). Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s. BMC Geriatrics, 14(23), 1-9.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    German
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=59.2 Years

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years; 65 + Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Germany

    Sample: Disability Type

    N/A

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    27%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Not Reported

    Sample: Size

    351

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach’s Alpha for the overalll survey (ɑ= 0.92)

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    Correlation with the severity of the dementia syndrome = -.21; with disturbing behavior = .53;

    Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)

    predicted the institutionalization of people with dementia

    Study design
    Cross-sectional