Community Integration Measure (CIM)

Share this page

Overview

Purpose
Measure community integration
Respondent
Person with a Disability
Administration Methods
  • Survey
  • Interview
Administration Modes
  • Phone
  • In-person
Developer
McColl, Davies, Carlson, Johnston, & Minnes, 2001
0
Population
Traumatic Brain Injury

Instrument Citation(s)

McColl, M.A., Davies, D., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., & Minnes, P. (1988). Community Integration Measure.
https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/community-integration-measure

Psychometric Citation

  • McColl, M.A., Davies, D., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., & Minnes, P. (2001). The Community Integration
    Measure: Development and Preliminary Validation Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82, 429-434.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=32.1 years

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Not Reported

    Sample: Disability Type

    Traumatic Brain Injury

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    37%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Not Reported

    Sample: Size

    92

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach’s Alpha for the overall survey (ɑ= 0.87)

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    exploratory factor analysis of the items produced 2 factors with factor loadings between .53 to .83

    Validity: Content Validity (e.g., Expert Judgement)

    Used an empirical and qualitative process for model development; The items have a 1-to-1 relationship with model concepts; Items were constructed using participant's own words

    Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)

    Correlations with other measures ranged from (r=.06 to .48)

    Study design
    Cross-sectional