Community Integration Measure (CIM)
Overview
- Purpose
- Measure community integration
- Respondent
- Person with a Disability
- Administration Methods
- Survey
- Interview
- Administration Modes
- Phone
- In-person
- Developer
- McColl, Davies, Carlson, Johnston, & Minnes, 2001
- Item Count
- 10
- Population
- Traumatic Brain Injury
Instrument Citation(s)
McColl, M.A., Davies, D., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., & Minnes, P. (1988). Community Integration Measure.
https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/community-integration-measure
Instrument Domains
| Domain | Number of Items |
|---|---|
| Community Inclusion | 7 |
| Meaningful activity | 2 |
| Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion | 1 |
| Social connectedness and relationships | 4 |
| Employment | 0 |
| Transportation | 0 |
| Caregiver Support | 0 |
| Access to resources | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support involvement | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing | 0 |
| Training and skill-building | 0 |
| Choice and Control | 0 |
| Choice of services and supports | 0 |
| Personal choices and goals | 0 |
| Personal freedoms and dignity of risk | 0 |
| Self-direction | 0 |
| Consumer Leadership in System Development | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| System supports meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| Equity | 0 |
| Availability | 0 |
| Equitable access and resource allocation | 0 |
| Transparency and consistency | 0 |
| Fluctuation of Need | 0 |
| Holistic Health and Functioning | 0 |
| Health promotion and prevention | 0 |
| Individual health and functioning | 0 |
| Human and Legal Rights | 0 |
| Freedom from abuse and neglect | 0 |
| Informed decision-making | 0 |
| Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights | 0 |
| Privacy | 0 |
| Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights | 0 |
| Level of Caregiver Well-Being | 0 |
| Person-Centered Planning and Coordination | 0 |
| Assessment | 0 |
| Coordination | 0 |
| Person-centered planning | 0 |
| Service Delivery and Effectiveness | 0 |
| Delivery | 0 |
| Person's needs met and goals realized | 0 |
| System Performance and Accountability | 0 |
| Data management and use | 0 |
| Evidence-based practice | 0 |
| Financing and service delivery structures | 0 |
| Workforce | 0 |
| Adequately compensated with benefits | 0 |
| Culturally competent | 0 |
| Demonstrated competencies when appropriate | 0 |
| Person-centered approach to services | 0 |
| Safety of and respect for the worker | 0 |
| Staff Turnover | 0 |
| Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability | 0 |
| Workforce engagement and participation | 0 |
Psychometric Citation
McColl, M.A., Davies, D., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., & Minnes, P. (2001). The Community Integration
Measure: Development and Preliminary Validation Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82, 429-434.- Type of Publication
- Peer review
- Instrument Language
- English
- Sample: Age (Mean and Range)
Mean=32.1 years
- Sample: Age Group
18-64 Years
- Sample: Countries/State
Not Reported
- Sample: Disability Type
Traumatic Brain Injury
- Sample: Gender (%male)
37%
- Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)
Not Reported
- Sample: Sampling Strategy
Not Reported
- Sample: Size
92
- Reliability: Internal Consistency
Cronbach’s Alpha for the overall survey (ɑ= 0.87)
- Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)
exploratory factor analysis of the items produced 2 factors with factor loadings between .53 to .83
- Validity: Content Validity (e.g., Expert Judgement)
Used an empirical and qualitative process for model development; The items have a 1-to-1 relationship with model concepts; Items were constructed using participant's own words
- Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)
Correlations with other measures ranged from (r=.06 to .48)
- Study design
- Cross-sectional