Experience of Care and Health Outcomes Survey, CAHPS Version 3.0 (ECHO)

Overview

Purpose
Assess experience with behavioral health care and services
Respondent
Person with a Disability
Administration Method
Interview
Administration Mode
In-person
Developer
CAHPS
Item Count
63
Population
Mental Health Challenges

Instrument Citation(s)

ECHO Managed Care Organization (MCO) Survey and Instructions
Download ECHO Managed Care Organization (MCO) Survey and Instructions. Content last reviewed March 2016. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
http://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/surveys-guidance/echo/instructions/mcosurveylist.html

ECHO Managed Behavioral Health Care Organization (MBHO) Survey and Instructions
Download ECHO Managed Behavioral Health Care Organization (MBHO) Survey and Instructions. Content last reviewed June 2016. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
http://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/surveys-guidance/echo/instructions/mbhosurveylist.html

Contents of the ECHO Survey and Reporting Kit 2004.
https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/cahps/surveys-guidance/echo/about/21_contents_echo_kit.pdf PDF

Get ECHO Surveys and Instructions. Content last reviewed March 2016. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/surveys-guidance/echo/instructions/index.html

Instrument Domains

DomainNumber of Items
Equity1
Equitable access and resource allocation1
Availability0
Transparency and consistency0
Holistic Health and Functioning10
Individual health and functioning10
Health promotion and prevention0
Human and Legal Rights7
Freedom from abuse and neglect1
Informed decision-making4
Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights1
Privacy1
Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights0
Person-Centered Planning and Coordination1
Assessment1
Coordination0
Person-centered planning0
Service Delivery and Effectiveness3
Delivery1
Person's needs met and goals realized2
Workforce6
Culturally competent1
Person-centered approach to services5
Adequately compensated with benefits0
Demonstrated competencies when appropriate0
Safety of and respect for the worker0
Staff Turnover0
Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability0
Workforce engagement and participation0
Caregiver Support0
Access to resources0
Family caregiver/natural support involvement0
Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing0
Training and skill-building0
Choice and Control0
Choice of services and supports0
Personal choices and goals0
Personal freedoms and dignity of risk0
Self-direction0
Community Inclusion0
Employment0
Meaningful activity0
Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion0
Social connectedness and relationships0
Transportation0
Consumer Leadership in System Development0
Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement0
Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement0
System supports meaningful consumer involvement0
Fluctuation of Need0
Level of Caregiver Well-Being0
System Performance and Accountability0
Data management and use0
Evidence-based practice0
Financing and service delivery structures0

Psychometric Citation

  • Beebe, T.J., Harrison, P.A., McRae, J.A., & Asche, S.E. (2003). Evaluating Behavioral Health Services in
    Minnesota’s Medicaid Population Using the Experience of Care and Health Outcomes (ECHO)
    Survey. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 14(4), 608-621.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    18-34 (46%);
    35-54 (45%);
    55+ (9%)

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Minnesota

    Sample: Disability Type

    Not Reported

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    13%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    White 77%, African American 5%, Asian 4%, American Indian 3%, Hispanic 4%, Other 7%

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Random sampling

    Sample: Size

    885

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach’s Alpha for Access to Treatment (ɑ=0.84);
    Cronbach’s Alpha for Communication With Clinicians (ɑ=0.86);
    Cronbach’s Alpha for Functional Improvement (ɑ=0.89);
    Cronbach’s Alpha for Effect of Treatment (ɑ=0.85)

    Study design
    Cross-sectional

States Using This Instrument

Clickable map of all States in the US.Click a State to learn more.

Waivers Associated with This Instrument