Maryland Assessment of Recovery in People with Serious Mental Illness

Overview

Purpose
To assess personal recovery status
Respondent
Person with a Disability
Administration Method
Survey
Administration Mode
Mail
Item Count
25
Population
Mental Health Challenges

Instrument Citation(s)

Instrument Domains

DomainNumber of Items
Choice and Control3
Personal choices and goals2
Personal freedoms and dignity of risk1
Choice of services and supports0
Self-direction0
Holistic Health and Functioning1
Individual health and functioning1
Health promotion and prevention0
Caregiver Support0
Access to resources0
Family caregiver/natural support involvement0
Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing0
Training and skill-building0
Community Inclusion0
Employment0
Meaningful activity0
Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion0
Social connectedness and relationships0
Transportation0
Consumer Leadership in System Development0
Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement0
Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement0
System supports meaningful consumer involvement0
Equity0
Availability0
Equitable access and resource allocation0
Transparency and consistency0
Fluctuation of Need0
Human and Legal Rights0
Freedom from abuse and neglect0
Informed decision-making0
Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights0
Privacy0
Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights0
Level of Caregiver Well-Being0
Person-Centered Planning and Coordination0
Assessment0
Coordination0
Person-centered planning0
Service Delivery and Effectiveness0
Delivery0
Person's needs met and goals realized0
System Performance and Accountability0
Data management and use0
Evidence-based practice0
Financing and service delivery structures0
Workforce0
Adequately compensated with benefits0
Culturally competent0
Demonstrated competencies when appropriate0
Person-centered approach to services0
Safety of and respect for the worker0
Staff Turnover0
Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability0
Workforce engagement and participation0

Psychometric Citation

  • Drapalski, A. L., Medoff, D., Unick, G. J., Velligan, D. I., Dixon, L. B., & Bellack, A. S. (2012). Assessing
    recovery of people with serious mental illness: development of a new scale. Psychiatric Services, 63(1), 48-53.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    25-65 years of age

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years, 65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Maryland, Texas

    Sample: Disability Type

    Mental Health Challenges

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    62% male

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    African American: 51%; Caucasian:25%; Hispanic:19%;Asian:2%; American Indian:2%

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Convenience Sample

    Sample: Size

    166

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach's alpha for overall scale ( α=.95)

    Reliability: Test-retest

    Test-retest correlation coefficent is .898

    Validity: Content Validity (e.g., Expert Judgement)

    Author mentioned that items were reviewed for content validity

    Study design
    Cross-Sectional