MOS Social Support Survey
Overview
- Purpose
- To assess social support
- Respondent
- Person with a Disability
- Administration Method
- Interview
- Administration Mode
- Phone 0
- Populations
- Mental Health Challenges
- Age Related Disability
Instrument Citation(s)
Sherbourne, C.D., & Stewart, A.L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social science and medicine,
32(6), 705-714.
Sherbourne, Cathy D. and Anita Stewart. The MOS Social Support Survey. Santa Monica, CA: RAND
Corporation, 1993. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP218.html
Psychometric Citation
Sherbourne, C.D., & Stewart, A.L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social science and medicine,
32(6), 705-714.- Type of Publication
- Peer review
- Instrument Language
- English
- Sample: Age (Mean and Range)
Mean age=55, range from 18-98
- Sample: Age Group
18-64 Years, 65+ Years
- Sample: Countries/State
United States
- Sample: Disability Type
Other
- Sample: Gender (%male)
39% male
- Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)
20% nonwhite
- Sample: Sampling Strategy
Stratified Random Sample
- Sample: Size
2987
- Reliability: Internal Consistency
Cronbach's alpha for overall support (α=0.97); emotional/info support (α=0.96); tangible support (α=0.92); positive interaction (α=0.94); affection (α=0.91);
- Reliability: Test-retest
One year stability coefficient for overall support (r=0.78), emotional/info support (r=0.72); tangible support (r=0.74); positive interaction (r=0.72); affection (r=0.76);
- Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)
Confirmatory factor analysis showed factors loadings above .76 for all subscales.
- Validity: Criterion Validity (Concurrent and Predictive)
The social support measures correlate highly with the measure of loneliness (r=-.67) and mental health (r=0.45)
- Study design
- Longitudinal