Ohio Department of Aging Resident Satisfaction Survey (OH-RCF)
Overview
- Respondent
- Person with a Disability
- Administration Method
- Interview
- Administration Mode
- In-person
- Item Count
- 46
- Population
- Age Related Disability
Instrument Domains
| Domain | Number of Items |
|---|---|
| Choice and Control | 12 |
| Choice of services and supports | 2 |
| Personal choices and goals | 8 |
| Self-direction | 2 |
| Personal freedoms and dignity of risk | 0 |
| Community Inclusion | 12 |
| Meaningful activity | 7 |
| Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion | 3 |
| Social connectedness and relationships | 4 |
| Employment | 0 |
| Transportation | 0 |
| Holistic Health and Functioning | 1 |
| Health promotion and prevention | 1 |
| Individual health and functioning | 0 |
| Human and Legal Rights | 7 |
| Freedom from abuse and neglect | 3 |
| Informed decision-making | 1 |
| Privacy | 3 |
| Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights | 0 |
| Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights | 0 |
| Person-Centered Planning and Coordination | 7 |
| Assessment | 5 |
| Coordination | 1 |
| Person-centered planning | 1 |
| Service Delivery and Effectiveness | 15 |
| Delivery | 10 |
| Person's needs met and goals realized | 5 |
| Workforce | 3 |
| Person-centered approach to services | 1 |
| Staff Turnover | 1 |
| Workforce engagement and participation | 1 |
| Adequately compensated with benefits | 0 |
| Culturally competent | 0 |
| Demonstrated competencies when appropriate | 0 |
| Safety of and respect for the worker | 0 |
| Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability | 0 |
| Caregiver Support | 0 |
| Access to resources | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support involvement | 0 |
| Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing | 0 |
| Training and skill-building | 0 |
| Consumer Leadership in System Development | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement | 0 |
| Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| System supports meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
| Equity | 0 |
| Availability | 0 |
| Equitable access and resource allocation | 0 |
| Transparency and consistency | 0 |
| Fluctuation of Need | 0 |
| Level of Caregiver Well-Being | 0 |
| System Performance and Accountability | 0 |
| Data management and use | 0 |
| Evidence-based practice | 0 |
| Financing and service delivery structures | 0 |
Psychometric Citation
Straker, J.K., Janssen, L.M., Stemen, S.E., Nelson, M., Young, M.A., & Brottman, B.J. (2016). IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2018 OHIO
NURSING HOME AND RESIDENTIAL CARE
FACILITY FAMILY SATISFACTION SURVEYS. Retrived from https://sc.lib.miamioh.edu/bitstream/handle/2374.MIA/6394/straker-Implementation-of-the-Family-Satisfaction-Survey-5-2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Type of Publication
- Technical report
- Instrument Language
- English
- Sample: Age (Mean and Range)
RCF Residents = 86.3;
RCF Families = 62.9- Sample: Age Group
65+ Years
- Sample: Countries/State
Ohio
- Sample: Disability Type
Age Related Disability
- Sample: Gender (%male)
RCF families 66.6%;
RCF Residents 76.2%- Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)
96.7% Caucasian; African American 2.1%; 1.2% others
- Sample: Sampling Strategy
Simple Random Sample
- Sample: Size
13,856
- Reliability: Internal Consistency
Cronbach’s Alpha for the whole RCF (ɑ= .98); Cronbach’s Alpha for Moving In (ɑ= .88); Cronbach’s Alpha for Spending Time (ɑ= .94); Cronbach’s Alpha for Care and Services (ɑ= .87); Cronbach’s Alpha for Caregiver (ɑ= .94); Cronbach’s Alpha for Meals and Dining (ɑ= .85); Cronbach’s Alpha for Environment (ɑ= .81); Cronbach’s Alpha for Facility Culture (ɑ= .96)
- Study design
- Cross-Sectional