PART-E - Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Enfranchisement

Share this page

Overview

Purpose
Measure community participation enfranchisement
Administration Method
Interview
Administration Mode
Phone
0
Population
Traumatic Brain Injury

Instrument Citation(s)

Heinemann, A.W., Lai, J., Magasi, S., Hammel, J., Corrigan, J.D., Bogner, J.A., & Whiteneck, G.G. (2011).
Measuring Participation Enfranchisement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92,
564-571.

Heinemann, A.W., Magasi, S., Bode, R.K., Hammel, J., Whiteneck, G.G., Bogner, J.A., & Corrigan, J.D.
(2013). Measuring Enfranchisement: Importance of and control over participation by people
with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 2157-2165.

Psychometric Citations

  • Heinemann, A.W., Lai, J., Magasi, S., Hammel, J., Corrigan, J.D., Bogner, J.A., & Whiteneck, G.G. (2011).
    Measuring Participation Enfranchisement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92,
    564-571.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=55 years

    Sample: Age Group

    Under 18 Years, 18-64 Years, 65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Colorado

    Sample: Disability Type

    Physical Disability, Traumatic Brain Injury, Other

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    37%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    94% white

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    a randomly selected, statewide sample

    Sample: Size

    912

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    person reliability =. 77

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    Exploratory factor analysis resulted in three factors with factor loading > .04;

    Confirmatory factor analysis: CFI=.856; TLI=.963; RMSE=.104;

    Persons without self-identified disabilities reported a higher level of enfranchisement than did persons with disabilities

    Study design
    Cross-sectional

  • Heinemann, A.W., Magasi, S., Bode, R.K., Hammel, J., Whiteneck, G.G., Bogner, J.A., & Corrigan, J.D. (2013). Measuring Enfranchisement: Importance of and control over participation by people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 2157-2165.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=53 years

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    United States

    Sample: Disability Type

    Not Reported

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    51%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    72% white;
    12% black;
    7% Hispanic

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Random sampling

    Sample: Size

    1163

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    person reliability =. 80

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    Exploratory factor analysis resulted in 2 factors with factor loadings > .40

    Confirmatory factor analysis: CFI=.94, RMSEA=.13 for control factor; CFIZ=.95, RMSEA=.10 for the importance factor;

    Rasch analysis on the importance and control scales;

    The control and importance measure varied significantly across levels of disability severity;

    Study design
    Cross-sectional