Overview

Purpose
Health outcomes appraisal
Respondents
  • Proxy
  • Person with a Disability
Administration Method
Interview
Administration Mode
In-person
Developer
Flanagan
Item Count
16
Population
Physical Disability

Instrument Domains

DomainNumber of Items
Community Inclusion10
Meaningful activity6
Social connectedness and relationships4
Employment0
Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion0
Transportation0
Holistic Health and Functioning1
Individual health and functioning1
Health promotion and prevention0
Caregiver Support0
Access to resources0
Family caregiver/natural support involvement0
Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing0
Training and skill-building0
Choice and Control0
Choice of services and supports0
Personal choices and goals0
Personal freedoms and dignity of risk0
Self-direction0
Consumer Leadership in System Development0
Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement0
Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement0
System supports meaningful consumer involvement0
Equity0
Availability0
Equitable access and resource allocation0
Transparency and consistency0
Fluctuation of Need0
Human and Legal Rights0
Freedom from abuse and neglect0
Informed decision-making0
Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights0
Privacy0
Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights0
Level of Caregiver Well-Being0
Person-Centered Planning and Coordination0
Assessment0
Coordination0
Person-centered planning0
Service Delivery and Effectiveness0
Delivery0
Person's needs met and goals realized0
System Performance and Accountability0
Data management and use0
Evidence-based practice0
Financing and service delivery structures0
Workforce0
Adequately compensated with benefits0
Culturally competent0
Demonstrated competencies when appropriate0
Person-centered approach to services0
Safety of and respect for the worker0
Staff Turnover0
Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability0
Workforce engagement and participation0

Psychometric Citations

  • Burckhardt, C.S., Woods, S.L., Schultz, A.A., & Ziebarth, D.M. (1989). Quality of life of adults with chronic illness: A psychometric study. Research in Nursing and Health, 12(6), 347-354.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=60 years

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years, 65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    United States

    Sample: Disability Type

    Not Reported

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    34%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    95% White

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Not Reported

    Sample: Size

    204

    Reliability: Internal Consistency

    Cronbach's Alpha for Time 1 (ɑ=.89); Cronbach's Alpha for Time 2 (ɑ= .86); Cronbach's Alpha for Time 3 (ɑ= .87)

    Reliability: Test-retest

    Test-retest correlation coefficient between Time 1 and Time 3 (r=.76); Test-retest correlation coefficient between Time 1 and Time 2 (r=.78); Test-retest correlation coefficient between Time 2 and Time 3 (r=.84)

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    Discriminating groups; correlations with other measures ranged from -.66 to .73

    Study design
    Longitudinal
  • Burckhardt, C.S., & Anderson, K.L., Archenholtz, B., & Hagg, O. (2003). The Flanagan Quality of Life Scale: Evidence of Construct Validity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. http://www.hqlo.com/content/1/1/59

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English and Swedish
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=52.5 years

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years, 65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    United States, Sweden

    Sample: Disability Type

    Not Reported

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    28%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Not Reported

    Sample: Size

    1241

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    Twelve of the 16 items loaded consistently with the same items on three factors in all five exploratory analyses.

    Study design
    Cross-sectional
  • Bronzi de Souza, L. & Corrente, J. (2013). Evaluation of the Flanagan Quality of Life Scale for older adults. International Journal of Science Commerce and Humanities, 1(4), 10-20.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    Portuguese
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Mean=72.1 years

    Sample: Age Group

    18-64 Years, 65+ Years

    Sample: Countries/State

    Brazil

    Sample: Disability Type

    Age Related Disability, Other

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    37% male

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Sampling Strategy

    Not Reported/Unknown

    Sample: Size

    365

    Validity: Construct (Convergent and Discriminant)

    Exploratory factor analysis resulted in five factors with factor loadings > .50

    Study design
    Cross-sectional