Temple University Community Participation Measure (TUCPM)
Overview
- Purpose
- To measure paricipation in community activities and importance.
- Respondent
- Person with a Disability
- Administration Methods
- Survey
- Interview
- Administration Mode
- In-person
- Developer
- Temple University Collaborative on Community Inclusion
- Item Count
- 78
- Population
- Mental Health Challenges
Instrument Citation(s)
Salazer, M.S., & Burns-Lynch, B. (2016). Peer facilitated community inclusion toolkit. Philadelphia, PA:
Temple University Collaborative on Community Inclusion for Individuals with Psychiatric
Disabilities.
http://tucollaborative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Peer-CI-Tool-Kit.pdf
Instrument Domains
Domain | Number of Items |
---|---|
Choice and Control | 26 |
Personal freedoms and dignity of risk | 26 |
Choice of services and supports | 0 |
Personal choices and goals | 0 |
Self-direction | 0 |
Community Inclusion | 78 |
Employment | 3 |
Meaningful activity | 78 |
Social connectedness and relationships | 4 |
Transportation | 2 |
Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion | 0 |
Caregiver Support | 0 |
Access to resources | 0 |
Family caregiver/natural support involvement | 0 |
Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing | 0 |
Training and skill-building | 0 |
Consumer Leadership in System Development | 0 |
Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement | 0 |
Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
System supports meaningful consumer involvement | 0 |
Equity | 0 |
Availability | 0 |
Equitable access and resource allocation | 0 |
Transparency and consistency | 0 |
Fluctuation of Need | 0 |
Holistic Health and Functioning | 0 |
Health promotion and prevention | 0 |
Individual health and functioning | 0 |
Human and Legal Rights | 0 |
Freedom from abuse and neglect | 0 |
Informed decision-making | 0 |
Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights | 0 |
Privacy | 0 |
Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights | 0 |
Level of Caregiver Well-Being | 0 |
Person-Centered Planning and Coordination | 0 |
Assessment | 0 |
Coordination | 0 |
Person-centered planning | 0 |
Service Delivery and Effectiveness | 0 |
Delivery | 0 |
Person's needs met and goals realized | 0 |
System Performance and Accountability | 0 |
Data management and use | 0 |
Evidence-based practice | 0 |
Financing and service delivery structures | 0 |
Workforce | 0 |
Adequately compensated with benefits | 0 |
Culturally competent | 0 |
Demonstrated competencies when appropriate | 0 |
Person-centered approach to services | 0 |
Safety of and respect for the worker | 0 |
Staff Turnover | 0 |
Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability | 0 |
Workforce engagement and participation | 0 |
Psychometric Citation
Salzer, M.S., Brusilovskiy, E., Prvu-Bettger, J., & Kottsieper, P. (2014). Measuring community
participation of adults with psychiatric disabilities: Reliability of two modes of data collection.
Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(2), 211-219.- Type of Publication
- Peer review
- Instrument Language
- English
- Sample: Age (Mean and Range)
Not Reported
- Sample: Age Group
Not Reported
- Sample: Countries/State
United States, Pennsylvania
- Sample: Disability Type
Mental Health Challenges
- Sample: Gender (%male)
40%
- Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)
19% White; 62% Black; 1% Asian; 2% Native American; 3% Latino/Hispanic; 14% multiracial
- Sample: Size
119
- Reliability: Test-retest
r ranged between 0.27 and 0.85; for categorical responses, Overall, the percentage agreement ranged from between 72.03% and 93.28%
- Study design
- Cross sectional