Temple University Community Participation Measure (TUCPM)

Overview

Purpose
To measure paricipation in community activities and importance.
Respondent
Person with a Disability
Administration Methods
  • Survey
  • Interview
Administration Mode
In-person
Developer
Temple University Collaborative on Community Inclusion
Item Count
78
Population
Mental Health Challenges

Instrument Citation(s)

Salazer, M.S., & Burns-Lynch, B. (2016). Peer facilitated community inclusion toolkit. Philadelphia, PA:
Temple University Collaborative on Community Inclusion for Individuals with Psychiatric
Disabilities.
http://tucollaborative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Peer-CI-Tool-Kit.pdf PDF

Instrument Domains

DomainNumber of Items
Choice and Control26
Personal freedoms and dignity of risk26
Choice of services and supports0
Personal choices and goals0
Self-direction0
Community Inclusion78
Employment3
Meaningful activity78
Social connectedness and relationships4
Transportation2
Resources and settings to facilitate inclusion0
Caregiver Support0
Access to resources0
Family caregiver/natural support involvement0
Family caregiver/natural support wellbeing0
Training and skill-building0
Consumer Leadership in System Development0
Evidence of meaningful caregiver involvement0
Evidence of meaningful consumer involvement0
System supports meaningful consumer involvement0
Equity0
Availability0
Equitable access and resource allocation0
Transparency and consistency0
Fluctuation of Need0
Holistic Health and Functioning0
Health promotion and prevention0
Individual health and functioning0
Human and Legal Rights0
Freedom from abuse and neglect0
Informed decision-making0
Optimizing the preservation of legal and human rights0
Privacy0
Supporting individuals in exercising their human and legal rights0
Level of Caregiver Well-Being0
Person-Centered Planning and Coordination0
Assessment0
Coordination0
Person-centered planning0
Service Delivery and Effectiveness0
Delivery0
Person's needs met and goals realized0
System Performance and Accountability0
Data management and use0
Evidence-based practice0
Financing and service delivery structures0
Workforce0
Adequately compensated with benefits0
Culturally competent0
Demonstrated competencies when appropriate0
Person-centered approach to services0
Safety of and respect for the worker0
Staff Turnover0
Sufficient workforce numbers dispersion and availability0
Workforce engagement and participation0

Psychometric Citation

  • Salzer, M.S., Brusilovskiy, E., Prvu-Bettger, J., & Kottsieper, P. (2014). Measuring community
    participation of adults with psychiatric disabilities: Reliability of two modes of data collection.
    Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(2), 211-219.

    Type of Publication
    Peer review
    Instrument Language
    English
    Sample: Age (Mean and Range)

    Not Reported

    Sample: Age Group

    Not Reported

    Sample: Countries/State

    United States, Pennsylvania

    Sample: Disability Type

    Mental Health Challenges

    Sample: Gender (%male)

    40%

    Sample: Race/Ethnicity (%)

    19% White; 62% Black; 1% Asian; 2% Native American; 3% Latino/Hispanic; 14% multiracial

    Sample: Size

    119

    Reliability: Test-retest

    r ranged between 0.27 and 0.85; for categorical responses, Overall, the percentage agreement ranged from between 72.03% and 93.28%

    Study design
    Cross sectional